Showing posts with label Editorial. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Editorial. Show all posts
Nostalgia Truths: Halloween Was Better Then
Oh, it's true. Damn true.
I bet you thought all these 'Nostalgia Truths' were going to be me just shitting on the past and destroying your precious childhood memories one by one. Well, you were wrong because not everything is better today than it was in the past and in this case Halloween today can't hold a candle to Halloween between 1970-2000.
1970 to 2000 you say? Yes, I do say. And to the unknowing mind those might seem like arbitrary dates when they, in fact, highlight the golden years of Halloween.
See (American) Halloween started off rough and tumble with kids going out causing mayhem, setting fires and playing pranks on the asshole next door. But by the 1930s people began to push the idea of trick-or-treating where instead of accepting the prank you could payoff the local youths with candy. Fine, that is a good trade off, give me candy and I won't throw dogshit at your house. And that deal seemed to really quell most of the vandalism for the next 40 years. But around 1970 the tides started to shift back to the earlier traditions of the holiday.
Why? because some people stopped following the rules.
Somewhere through the years many of people stopped handing out treats or they started handing out toothbrushes. These were not the agreed upon terms for the cease fire so naturally the war had to begin again.
The war to take back the night began in the 70s with light pranks. Soaping of car windows, pumpkins smashed on the porch and toilet paper covering your lawn and vehicle. These pranks weren't played on everyone they were reserved for the ones who didn't honor the 'Halloween Code'. And for the most part it never went beyond that.
The 80s were a weird decade because at the beginning we saw the fear of poisoned candy come into play and in 1982 we almost saw the death of Halloween as we know it. Also we saw the rise of Devil's Night where no longer was a bonfire going to cut it, you had to burn down a city block (Note: it sounds extreme but most of these fires were lit in abandoned buildings.) Yet Americans have a great ability to forget and by 1985 kids were running rampant playing pranks and staying out till near midnight collecting candy. All was well until....
The 90s were the last great decade for the mischievous night dwellers and the connoisseur of candy alike. You could run all night collecting sacks of candy and when you were rebuffed from collecting your sweets you unleashed a fury of eggs on the person who dare withhold those sweet treasures from your grasp. There was no time limit yet on trick-or-treating and no one called the police for throwing eggs, corn or bags of poo at a house. Hell even the cops agreed that this was the only time of the year that this was acceptable.
All seemed well till around 1998 when the rumblings of a designated trick-or-treat time started happening. Some towns adopted this while others didn't but each year the rumors grew till they were no longer rumors. In a act to stop kids from running the streets all night a time for trick-or-treating had been set around the nation and, to really fuck with the kids, no longer did it start at dark. The new rule saw Trick-or-Treat start when it was day and end when it got dark. They said it was for the safety of the people but really it was to stop the youth from pranking and clogging the streets all night.
After 2000 The holiday just went down the shitter. No more kids playing pranks or filling their sacks with candy. People stopped handing out good treats and started handing out apples because little Billy down the street was allergic to peanuts or they just stopped handing out treats all together.
Now the holiday is just a husk of its former self. Only one in every four house give anything out and that is if your lucky. Houses now have special pumpkins because god forbid Billy touches something with gluten in it. Some towns try to limit the ability for costumes to have full face masks and the time for actual trick-or-treating has shrunk to near nonexistence. The pranks are not doable because of curfew and those who do deserve the prank now have 100 cameras and the FBI on speed dial.
Halloween was the one time of the year that let every kid, for one night, gorge on candy till they puked their brains out, play pranks on those who deserve it and be free from the watchful eye of the overbearing parent. It was a time when youths could purge the mischievousness from their system feel the excitement of danger when, in actuality, there was no real danger.
What was once acceptable has now been labeled heinous criminal activity. We once lived by a code of "no harm, no foul" but now everything (mentally) harms everyone. This is why Halloween was better then, than it is now.
Rich Stile @TheDevilsEyes1
Nostalgia Truths: VHS & Video Stores Sucked
Well-let-me-tell-ya-something-brother...
No. This isn't a shoot article to rile up a bunch of people who are in love with the ways of yesteryear, this is the truth about life before now. See, a lot of people can't stop themselves from going online and reminiscing about "how fun it was to visit the local video store back in the day" and to a degree I, myself, am included in this group of assholes.
Visiting the local video store was a great experience. The sights, sounds and smells are ones that I can recall to this day. There was nothing like spending an hour combing over cool box art and coming across a movie that you had never seen or heard of before. And a good rule of thumb was that the cooler the box art the better your chances of the the movie sucking was going to be. But that didn't stop you, you grabbed it anyway because you knew this one was going to be different. There was nothing like the experience, because it was the only way to experience new or classic film. But therein lies the problem, it was the only way.
What I described above was a good day at the video store, which more often than not, was a rare thing. The true visit to the video store went more along the lines of self-inflicted torture.
If I wanted to go to the video store I had to ride my bike or walk because no one was going to drive me three times a week to look at movies, if I wanted a ride I'd have to wait till Friday (which was movie night). But no problem, it was only a mile jaunt to the local mom and pop store which only took a few minutes, when the weather was nice. When the weather was bad, still a few minutes, but fuck did that journey suck especially when it was winter. Once I'd get there I'd head straight for the 'New Releases' section because who knows what came out since I was last here (yea, a whole 36hrs ago) and find that none of those films were in stock. Okay, no biggie, maybe I'll just see if anything got past me in the Horror section and see what we're working with. This is where I'd spend the bulk of my time, about 40 minutes, and then end up grabbing something that had cool art (which sucked) and re-renting Nightmare 3 and Fright Night. Why re-rent? Because I'd given up and knew that I would still enjoy these even though I had seen them a thousand times. Now its time to collect my movies and be on my way, but wait there is a line and almost all the tapes have been returned without being rewound. So they throw them into a tape rewinder (it was like a vcr but only rewound the tape but faster than a vcr could) and then after fifteen minutes of boring small talk I was able to get on my way back home.
This wasn't the worst experience ever and rarely did I have a problem with late fees because of the proximity of the store to my house. But after a fire and the opening of a Hollywood Video a few miles away, shit got way worse.
Hollywood Video was ten miles away so that cut out walking or biking, but at that point I could drive and so could my friends. Now getting there wasn't overly hard, but trying to get there before 3pm, with five movies, so you didn't get a $1000.00 dollars in late fees was. Seemed like no matter what making sure your tapes were rewound and back at the right time was like a scene out of every action film ever made. And if those tapes weren't rewound you had to pay for that too. If the mom and pop adventures were torture then this was an execution.
Hollywood Video was out of the way, never had the new shit (and if they did it was at a premium) and was a madhouse of people all the time scrambling to snatch up videos before anyone else could. This exercise in bullshit went on for a long time even when DVDs hit the market. They still couldn't manage to keep new films in stock, but by then the writing was on the wall.
See it seemed okay at the time because we didn't have any options. You could either waste time and money renting a movie and then be in a mad dash to return it or hit up Suncoast video and drop 40.00 dollars on owning one movie. Given those options renting was awesome and fun, but looking back it was just the lesser of two evils.
So the next time you wanna brag or reminisce about how great it was to hit up the local video store when you were a kid remember this. You wasted money to get there, money on a movie you didn't own, money because it was returned late and money because you forgot to rewind it.
Video Stores were cool on a good day but most of the time they just sucked.
Rich Stile Twitter: @TheDevilsEyes1
The New American Dream: Patreon and a Podcast
Podcasts are great. They are not beholden to any rules and can explore a subject matter for as long as they choose to. As each year passes more and more shows spring up with a variety of topics ranging from the most common (religion) to the most obscure (sexual attraction to inanimate objects that are hexagonal). Okay, I made that last one up (it might exist) but you get the picture, If there is a thing out there then there is a podcast for it. But lately many a casters have found themselves no longer concerned with the quality of their show but what they can "charge" for said show.
What was once a great break from bullshit radio is now filled with bullshit itself. Now it must be noted that there are still a good number of podcasts that don't push donations because they are successful and able to attract sponsors. Marc Maron's WTF Podcast doesn't spend 20 minutes pushing different tiers for finical support, he just gives you some ramble about a Casper mattress and then its on with the show. This applies more to the thousands of other assholes who think after 20 episodes they should be making 10k a month to produce Deep Space Nine Fan-Fiction Radio Dramas, do interviews with C list Celebrities or take you on twisted tales of the paranormal.
Patreon's tagline is "Creators, come get paid" and they do not call it donations, its called a membership based business for your fans. That's great and creators should get paid, but the problem is that every dick with a Blue mic now thinks he is the next Larry King or Rod Serling. That's not even the worse part, those who were producing a good podcast with potential crumbled and shifted focus to Patreon because "everyone else is doing it". Now those once respectable shows spend a good amount of time pushing tiers and asking for support just to make another episode where they can ask you for more support all while ignoring the quality of their show.
Usually I'd name drop but there really are far to many to name and the truth is that almost every podcast has shifted to begging for money. Long gone are the days of putting in the work and getting sponsors or sell time to run an ad, now it's give me money. Not just give me money to do the show but to make it a full time endeavor, pay my rent, feed my cat, pay the electric bill, clothe my sister and every other fucking thing that isn't remotely connected to the podcast. And on top of the begging they make it out like you're not "fan enough" if you don't select a top tier to donate. What once was a entertaining medium has now turned into a PBS pledge drive with shitty perks of shout-outs, stickers, early access and whatever other bullshit they can concoct.
The sad thing is that many of the listeners are more than happy to throw their money at someone who will talk about whatever niche nonsense their into. Yet it's not the listener who will be hurt in the long run, it's the creator. Rather than build something with a strong foundation you are essentially relying on handouts and one day the handout bubble will burst and you will be left with nothing but your mic and dick (or vagina) in hand.
Creators should get paid, but only if the content they create is worthy and if the content they create is worthy then there should be no problem for them to turn that content into a stable profitable venture. But forgoing everything and hoping that Patreon will keep you afloat till you retire is just idiotic. Instead of running your PBS pledge drive every episode to afford you the luxury of creating "new and amazing content", maybe focus that energy on finding a way to sell yourself and not beg for yourself.
Both the creators and Patreon are responsible for this line of instant gratification thinking. Patreon re-enforces the idea that everyone is a star creator and should be payed accordingly. While the retarded people who run these podcasts over value themselves and believe everyone would pay a bundle to here them drone on about the latest rumors surrounding Halloween 2018.
And in case you weird-ass Youtubers (you know who you are) feel left out, don't be, because this applies to you as well.
Rich Stile @TheDevilsEyes1
Gun Media Using Miller Lawsuit As Scapegoat For Botched F13 Game
If you haven't heard Gun Media announced that it has canceled plans for updates and DLC to the IllFonic-developed game, Friday The 13th.
Their statement is as follows:
"When we originally learned that the game fell within the cross-hairs of this legal dispute, we tried to balance the creation of new content requested by our fans against the maintenance and bug fixing that our community expects and deserves. We attempted to do both within the limits of the legal case."
"We’ve now been forced to accept that the lawsuit makes future content for the game, including alternate play modes, new playable Jasons and Counselors, and new maps, unfeasible now or in the future. Although the listed content types will be affected, we remain committed to launching dedicated servers on our console platforms and providing the continued maintenance and bug fixing important to supporting our fan base."
Which doesn't seem to make a lot of sense considering that 11 months ago they were assured by Cunningham and Horror INC. that the game would be safe from any litigation.
According to Horror, INC. lawyer Robert Wyman "The Victor Miller claim does not impact the current game being distributed by Gun Media now or in the future.” Wyman was able to clarify further by stating that “even if he won his action, Mr. Miller would not own the Jason character as he has come to be known and loved and feared. He did not create the title and so would not have the right to control its use.”
Friday the 13th, the title, was created by Cunningham. If Victor Miller were to win he would only have claim to the story of F13. Meaning characters (Pamela, young drowned Jason, Alice, Crazy Ralph), Location (Camp Crystal Lake) and the backstory of Jason. The actual Jason that most are familiar with didn't come around till part 3 and again it was Cunningham's idea to have Jason be the killer in future installments.
As you can see the Friday the 13th Game would only have to contend with with minor changes if Victor Miller were to win his case and could not arrange a deal for their use with Gun Media. And that is only if they continued to update the game with anything involving the original movie and that what they created for the game was after the termination of rights date (July 1, 2018). Meaning if they were working on Crazy Ralph prior to the actual rights termination date then he would be exempt from new negotiations.
I believe the answer to why Gun is halting the game is very simple. They are, and have been, in over their heads and can not continue. From the very beginning the game has be plagued with server issues, bugs and glitches. From characters spawning in walls to not being able to find a match the game was just not ready for release. Though updates have been made the game itself is far from an ideal finished product. A Friday the 13th Game was, and is, a fantastic idea. The team behind the game do have an appreciation for the films and showcased that by bringing in Kane Hodder for the MoCap. But they still bit off more than they could chew and now there is no way around it.
I understand the trials of being an indy company but promising the moon and only delivering a rock is unacceptable by any standards, especially when those promises were backed by real dollars from real people.
No the Victor Miller lawsuit did not kill the Friday The 13th game, but it did provide a hell of a scapegoat to a company that put out a product that just wasn't ready for market.
From the complaint
On January 26, 2016, Miller issued a purported Notice of Termination of the copyright(s) in and to the Screenplay under Section 203(a) of the United States Copyright Act (17 U.S.C. § 203(a)) (the “Termination Notice”). However, although the Termination Notice was directed to the Manny Company and several of Horror’s licensees, it was not served on Horror, the current copyright holder, and was therefore defective on its face. On June 27, 2016, Miller re-issued his purported Notice of Termination (the “First Amended Termination Notice”), which included Horror and purported to be effective on July 1, 2018. Further, on July 14, 2016, Miller once again re-issued his purported Notice of Termination, modifying some of the recipients’ addresses (“Second Amended Termination Notice”)
Sources:
Victor Miller Lawsuit
Victor Miller Lawsuit (2)
Friday Lawsuit and Game
Friday The 13th Game Review
Friday The 13th Game Review (2)
Horror INC. V Miller Full Complaint
Docket for Horror INC v Miller
Why Z Nation Is Better Than The Walking Dead
I honestly thought those words would never come out of my mouth " Z Nation is better than The Walking Dead", but here I am saying just that and have been for a little over a year. It didn't start out that way, quite the opposite, it was more of a gradual shift in both shows that has brought me two this opinion.
The Walking Dead was very good and really filled a hole in the television market, but as the seasons progressed it moved away from entertaining to just a cluster of drama on top of drama. No real development for the characters and pointless buildup to characters who may or may not die. And while it does work in a dramatic sense a person can only take so much before they get burnt out... Which is exactly what happened with me (and clearly a lot of other people).
When a show just keeps hammering on drama it can become very draining and, as a result, cause those really emotional dramatic scenes to lose all their power and makes the viewer no longer invested in the characters. This is where Z Nation has managed to find a perfect balance of zombie comedy with heartbreaking emotion.
Z Nation knows what it is, a comedy about a zombie apocalypse that kills zombies in fun, creative ways all while showing a core group's misadventures through a wasteland of shenanigans. There should not be any drama because it is a fun show... But wait, there is drama and because they don't hammer it to death it catches you out of nowhere and hits you like a ton of brick.
The arc of the characters of Z Nation has been far better than those of The Walking Dead. While TWD has chosen to give no real growth to their characters, just breaks in sanity, Z Nation has taken unlikable cowards and turned them into heroes, fathers and badass leaders. Keith Allan, DJ Qualls and Kellita Smith have turned in some of the best performances I have ever seen on television. They played their characters straight and it paid off huge to the point where theses three are the backbone of the show.
While Z Nation may have set out to be a goofy take on a zombie apocalypse it has quickly evolved into more than that. It is a show about growth, family, friendship and never giving up even when the odds are against you. The bonus is that every episode has a unique story with awesome zombies and, most likely, a guest star that will be used for more than just zombie food (Walking Dead had Ethan Embry and killed him for no reason and no contribution to the plot.)
Rich Stile @TheDevilsEyes1
The Halloween Sequel Is a Lose-Lose Situation
Halloween, a franchise that many would argue kicked off the slasher genre and birth many of the killers that we know and love, is in the process of wiping the slate clean and starting anew. But for a franchise that began in 1978 and has had only two solid entries, the series amounts to nothing more than missteps, cash grabs and ignoring previous entries to "wipe the slate clean". (Barring the Rob Zombie movies which, love them or hate them, at least tried something new.)
The Halloween sequel that is in production is claiming to ignore all the terrible sequels and even ignoring the sequel that many enjoy as much as the original. This may rile a few feathers but, for the most part, sounds decent and this entry will have John Carpenter's input along with Jamie Lee returning as Laurie and Nick Castle returning to play Michael Myers (The Shape, gotta say The Shape to keep it hip with the movie buffs out there). So how could this possibly be a lose-lose situation for anyone? [See: H20 and Resurrection]..... No, that is just a cheap shot and a cop-out, here is an actual answer.
First lets look at it like this, this movie could be really, really good. And if that is how it goes great, but not so great. Why? Because, we will get this one great movie that will make a ton of money and everyone involved will make a ton of money and then we are back on the rushed sequel train [See: Previous Halloween Sequels for Examples] because they can't leave money on the table. And rightfully so, movies are no longer an expression or an art form, they are commodities and when something makes money you squeeze till you can't squeeze no more. Also, to be clear, Carpenter, Jamie Lee and Castle did not come back because they love the Halloween franchise, they came back because they love getting paid large sums of money.
John Carpenter talking about his films being remade “I love it, if they are going to pay me money. If they pay me, it’s wonderful. If they don’t pay me, I don’t care. I think it’s unfair if they don’t pay me. I think everyone should pay me. Why not? I’m an old guy now and I need money. Send me money.”
Then after a few terrible sequels get pumped out they will try and do another remake with whoever is hot at the time and then they come back, wipe the slate clean, again, wheel out a 90 year old Jamie lee and continue the never ending cycle that is this franchise. All the while ignoring the fact that most people would be happy with just a simple story, some continuity, Michael Myers and a decent body count [See: Fast and Furious for Examples].
But what if the movie is terrible? Well, then it will still make a huge amount of money and either create more terrible sequels or it will kill any hopes of seeing a decent Halloween movie for many, many years to come [See: Nightmare on Elm St. and Friday the13th for Examples]. And lets be honest, even if the movie is bad they will still get 10USD out of each and everyone of us, myself included, because we are curious and its a Halloween movie.
Either way you cut it it's a lose-lose situation (you like that, I said it) and, not only us, but while all these terrible sequels are being churned out that means the next potential slasher is getting passed on or being terribly underfunded [See: Hills Run Red, Hatchet and Behind the Mask for Examples].
In closing I hope the new movie is great and if a sequel were to happen I hope that they take time to make it work and not force it. But I'm also a realist so I offer this: expect nothing and you are never disappointed.
Rich Stile @TheDevilsEyes1
RIP McDonald's Halloween Pails [1986-2016]
As a kid nothing said Halloween like going to McDonald's and getting their special Happy Meal Pail. You knew you were in for a treat when the 1st of October came around; what was it going to be this year? The McBoo? The Witch, Ghost or Pumpkin? Even when they rolled over to feature Scooby-Doo and Charlie Brown they still retained a bit of nostalgia signaling that trick or treat was right around the corner. But sadly McDonald's has killed the Halloween Happy Meal Pail.
It looks like last year's (2016) Charlie Brown pails are the end of the road for McDonald's Halloween Pails. Instead of pails this year they opted for Transformer and My Little Pony toys.
We reached out to McDonald's for a comment but have yet to receive a response.
I was going to do a write up about the history of the pails, but if you head over to Dinosaur Dracula they have a nice write-up about the pails and the McNugget Buddies.
Looking Into Fangoria, Thomas DeFeo and The Brooklyn Company Inc.
On February 11th 2017 I broke the news that Fangoria Magazine would never see a print issue again. After getting over the shock that such a major publication, and horror genre staple, would cease to exist, many claims of alleged non-payment for work began to pour in. Not only that but many subscribers to the magazine complained of never receiving their orders. After many messages, and some digging, this is what I was able to uncover.
The complaints for non-delivery of Fangoria issues appear to start around July of 2014 and the Better Business Bureau has a record of sixteen complaints over the last three years. The BBB's current rating of both Fangoria and The Brooklyn Company Inc. is F and they are not BBB accredited. As of this writing seven of those complaints have yet to see a resolution.
Currently Both Thomas DeFeo and The Brooklyn Company Inc. are being sued in New York County Civil Court by American Express. The filling of this civil suit dates back to 4/16/2013 and is currently active under the Honorable Debra Rose Samuels. (see above image)
While news of Fangoria no longer printing was making the rounds Bleeding Cool was working on a article about alleged non-payment to Fangoria staffer Josh Hadley who claims to also be in the process of suing Thomas DeFeo in Small Claims Court.
Cody Brown and Kevin Thomas of Studiohouse Designs claim that they have yet to receive payment for their cover of issue #348 which features Kevin Smith. Per their complaint they were promised payment, copies of issue #348 and a full feature in issue #349.
@FANGORIA Oh yeah? Will it include our payment for the cover we drew which is also your profile picture?— Studiohouse Designs (@StudiohouseDSGN) February 13, 2017
Finally comes the many allegations of subscribers who have paid for physical issues and received nothing. There are far too many to list but the common theme seems to be that they paid for a year subscription and received nothing or were sent a link to a digital issue with promises of that issue in print very soon. However, a few stated that they received a single issue at the beginning of 2016.
So what does this all mean? Well, I'm not a lawyer but I would begin by exploring every legal avenue you have at your disposal to get what is owed to you, be it unfulfilled orders or unpaid work. And as far as "We will carry forward and devote our efforts to make amends with all that have been inconvenienced in our current state of affairs." I'm no doctor but I wouldn't hold my breathe till then.
Lastly, try and remember that the actual publication FANGORIA didn't do wrong it was, allegedly, the man behind the curtain who was running the show. And if that publication were to come back, under new ownership, we should not look upon the magazine with any hard feelings but joy that a historied publication was able to rise out of the ashes and return to its glory.
Rich Stile @TheDevilsEyes1
Why Rob Zombie Should Make the Next Friday the 13th
Rob Zombie, no other name in the horror genre stirs more polarizing emotional responses than this man. Fans either love him or they hate him, there is no middle ground. Yet the man has proven himself as a more than capable filmmaker and a powerhouse in the genre. These qualities and more are why the next installment of Friday the 13th franchise should be helmed by this man.
First lets look at the facts before we get bogged down by opinions. The fact is Rob Zombie is very fiscally responsible. He doesn't require excessive amounts of money to churn out a quality product. Case in point, Halloween (2007). With a budget of only 15 million he was able to bring in 80 million world wide and it still sits as the highest opening weekend for a movie over Labor Day weekend ever. And when looking at all of Zombie's films, each one was able to bring in three to four times its budget (barring Lords of Salem). So from a financial standpoint the risk is very low and WB/New Line are sure to, at least, break-even.
Going hand-in-hand with the financial aspect is shooting time. Zombie can shoot a feature in 40 days or less because of his meticulous planning of each and every shot. This has been documented at great lengths on House of a 1000 Corpses, Devil's Rejects and Halloween DVD's. By doing extensive planning he is able to make his days and some. When it comes to horror you want someone who can make their days on time, under budget and is fully aware that this is a horror film, not a arthouse, Oscar contention film.
Lastly Zombie works extremely well in the Slasher sub-genre of Horror. His most refined talents lie within his ability to execute death on screen in visually amazing ways. And that is what Friday the 13th is built upon, awesome kills by a man in a hockey mask. Zombie's over the top kills fall perfectly inline with this series, more so than they did with Halloween. This is one of the few franchises where the more sick and vicious the kill the better (Only TCM would be the most suited to his style).
I'm sure I could go on and on about Zombie and why he could do the property justice and I'm sure many could do the same about why he couldn't. But when it comes to simple, body count, splatter horror Zombie can bring it in Spades. And where the franchise is at right now it would be impossible for him to ruin it, the only place it can go is up.
Rich Stile @TheDevilsEyes1
How Jacques Plante Changed the Face of Hockey and Horror Forever
Friday the 13th Part 3 is probably the most iconic installment in the Friday 13th franchise. With that entry the killer went from son of the first killer, with sack on head, to the iconic Jason Voorhees. But what makes Jason stand out above everyone, barring Myers, is his white goalie mask with red chevrons. That image is now one of pop-cultural significance and ingrained in the minds of people the world over.
The following is a quick history about where that mask came from...
On November 1, 1959, Montreal Canadien Jacques Plante becomes the first NHL goaltender to wear a full facemask.
The first-place Montreal Canadiens (8-2-3) were playing the struggling New York Rangers (2-7-2) at Madison Square Garden. Barely three minutes into that night’s game, ace right winger Andy Bathgate fired a backhand shot from only a few feet away. It cracked Plante across the face, splitting his lip from the corner of his mouth up into his nostril. Blood poured onto the ice and Plante was taken to the locker room to get stitches. After a 21-minute delay, Plante returned to the Canadiens' bench carrying his cream-colored mask. Blake, the Canadiens' coach, had pitched a fit about it, but Plante firmly stated. “If I don’t wear the mask, I’m not playing.”
Teammates, opponents, fans and reporters mocked Plante mercilessly about it, but Plante didn’t care. “I already had four broken noses, a broken jaw, two broken cheekbones and almost 200 stitches in my head,” he pointed out. “I didn’t care how the mask looked.” And the truth is that Plante was such a good goalie that it almost didn’t matter what he did.
Once it caught on, most goaltenders wore Plante-designed masks until the end of the 1960s, when Soviet goalies introduced cage-style masks that made it easier to see.That brings us to Martin Jay Sadoff The 3D Supervisor on Friday the 13th part 3 and editor on part 7.
Now there are many conflicting reports on who decided to put the mask on Jason, even Cunningham thought it was Steve Miner's idea because he was shooting hockey documentaries (this is untrue on many levels). But the consensus is that Sadoff grabbed the mask for a makeup test, from the trunk of his car, and when Miner saw it he instantly fell in love with it. The only hitch was that the mask was a medium sized Plante mask and it needed to be reworked to fit Richard Brooker's head.
Sadoff confirmed this during a panel discussion at the 2007 Screamfest LA Film Festival. "The day of the makeup test, we didn't really know what Jason should really look like," Sadoff told the crowd. "We had to come up with some kind of makeup test in 3-D. I had a hockey mask there and I said, 'Why don't we put it on and see what it looks like?' I only wish I had registered the hockey mask [as a trademark] because every Halloween, that's all I see!"
That, my friends, is how hockey came to have goalies with facemasks and the horror genre gained an iconic slasher. Just think, if Plante didn't get wacked with a puck, and make the mask a necessary piece of hockey equipment, then we would never have gotten the Jason Voorhees that we know and love today.
Rich Stile @TheDevilsEyes1
Accurately Unstable: Halloween's Important & Memorable Moments
Accurately Unstable: Halloween's Important & Memorable Moments, host Vincent Paul sits down to talk about the franchise that started it all.
Just going over some of my personal Memorable and Important Moments from the Halloween franchise. There are so many, this is just the first couple that come to mind.
I also purposely committed a mistake or three. Can you catch them?
Vince Paul @knowyourhorror
Trite Fecal Matter: American Horror Story and Scream Queens
Insert over used Dark Knight quote here because American Horror Story is now the villain of cable television. It started as a thing of beauty and a break from the mundane, but now is the mundane and audiences need a break.
American Horror Story's first four seasons are awesome and nothing can take that away, but the longer you drag out a series that is visibly in decline the less likely it is to be remembered as a good show gone bad, but more of just a bad show. The questions that are raised here is why was season five so terrible and why does season six not seem any better?
The first thing that comes to mind is the loss of Jessica Lange from the main cast. She was the glue that held the series together, but her exit left a gaping hole. The quick fix to this problem was Lady Gaga, bring her fans over to counter the fans that would leave the series. Bad move. Season five had the least viewed finale out of the series.
The second thing that comes to mind is Brad Falchuk and Ryan Murphy are being stretched to thin between this series and Scream Queens. With the undertaking of another series on the parent station, the duo are not able to cultivate the proper stories for either series. This is also evident in the ratings of Scream Queens and its steady decline from its first episode. So-much-so that many where caught off guard when news of a second season broke, even the target demographic said "Why?"
Either Falchuk and Murphy are burned-out or FOX/FX is trying to squeeze them for everything they can. Whichever may be the case these series are suffering. And when the series suffer the viewers suffer, because if they believe this lower caliber work is still attracting an audience then there is no reason for them to create a better product.
There is still time to fix the problem, but not if the viewers keep taking and taking shovel fulls of fecal matter to the eyes while saying thank you. The only thing people understand is money, don't tune in, they lose money and in no time at all they will quickly fix the problem.
Rich Stile @TheDevilsEyes1
Greatest Song Ever Wolfie's Just Fine: A New Beginning
Friday the 13th V: The New Beginning was released in 1985 and picks up several years after The Final Chapter. Tommy Jarvis, the young boy who managed to kill Jason at the end of the previous film, is now an adult who has be bounced around from institutions and finally lands at Pinehurst Halfway House. When one of the residents kills another, one of the paramedics who arrives on the scene,Roy Burns, seems particularly distraught. The next day, Jason Voorhees, wearing a slightly altered hockey mask, seems to have returned and proceeds to butcher nearly everybody in and around the halfway house. The ending reveals that the killer wasn’t Jason at all, but grieving paramedic Roy Burns avenging the death of his son.
It usually at this point when majority screams this entry sucks, but does it really? No, no it does not.
A New Beginning is more or a Friday film than many of the sequels that were to follow and is shot in such a manner that it closely resembles the first entry, when his mother was the killer, with the tightly shot kills, heavily featured hands and building of tension. Sure it wasn't actually Jason doing the killing, but for all intents and purposes it was. Had it not been revealed that it was Roy doing the killing, the film would have gotten a lot more praise rather than franchise fan hate.
This brings me to Jon Lajoie (Taco on The League) and his ode to one of the most underrated entries into the Friday the 13th franchise. The song isn't just a love letter to a good slasher sequel, but a love letter to the horror genre as a whole. A New Beginning was Lajoie's gateway to the genre and he expresses this is the best possible way; through song.
Now listen to Wolfie's Just Fine: A New Beginning as Lajoie tells you a tale of how he, myself and many other genre fans felt when we watched our first horror film... Many thanks Jon Lajoie.
Ghostbusters Remake Wasn't Made For You...Or Was It?
Paul Feig has released the Ghostbusters trailer and, to no real surprise, it's getting trashed. Now is this a warranted response or are fanboys of the original two just bashing the movie because this is "ruining their childhood"?
I have managed to not write about the Ghostbusters movie until now because A) I'm not going to hype up or trash a franchise remake without seeing a trailer and B) I would rather write about something else, not speculation pieces based on a set image. But today Feig dropped the trailer and now I feel I can determine where I stand on the final product.
I was and still am a fan of The Real Ghostbusters cartoon series. It was a great show that followed everyone's favorite ghost catchers on their daily escapades and heavily featured Slimer as their in-house ghost/mascot. If you were a kid during this period of time then you know how awesome the series was and if you weren't, just check out the shows intro...
Cut to a few years later and I have two boys who enjoy both movies and the cartoon series. So, as any dad would do, I used my kids as a focus group. To keep it simple I asked the following questions about the trailer:
1. Did you like the trailer? Yes or No
2. Why did or didn't you like it?
3. Do you want to go see it?
4. would you rather watch this or the original right now?
I started with the 8yr old, who likes the cartoon more than the movies, and he answered:
1. Yes
2. It had more ghosts just like the cartoon.
3. Yes, please.
4. This one because it is newer and has tons of cool ghosts.
Then I moved to the 4yr old, who likes the movies more than the cartoon, and he answered:
1.No
2. Not real Ghostbusters (Dan, Bill, ect.)
3. No
4. Ghostbusters we have....(sees other trailer) can we watch the angry bird movie?
Well, the response I got wasn't what I expected but it makes sense. After watching the trailer a few times I see what my oldest sees, a live-action adaptation of the cartoon series. It was at this point I brought in my wife and she (doesn't have a favorite) had the same responses as my oldest. More ghosts, newer stuff, looks kinda funny and so on.
The results say this: This adaptation is aimed at a much younger audience (my youngest is just an anomaly) and, to some extent, the people who enjoyed the cartoon series. So if you go in thinking of it as a Ghostbusters remake, you're not going to like it. But if you look at it as a adaptation of The Real Ghostbusters cartoon series then you might enjoy the flick.
Now, me personally, I find it okay, I don't hate it but I'm not in love with it. I like how it has the tone and feel of the cartoon and the cast is comprised of three of the funniest girls from SNL, but I would have liked to see a true third Ghostbusters film. Even with the passing of Ramis it could have worked as a passing of the torch movie, but now that ship has sailed. So will this be a great entry into the franchise? Probably not, but it looks like it will be an acceptable one. And really it doesn't matter what I or you think because our generation had its time, now it's another generation's turn.
CleanFlicks Returns as VidAngel Streaming Service
Many months back I stumbled across a documentary called Cleanflix (about a company called CleanFlicks), which told the story of video rental stores in Mormon country (Utah) that would edit movies of all foul language and nudity. The idea was to provide an avenue for Mormons to watch movies that they normally wouldn't be able to watch. Regardless of how queer this sounds to the rest of the world, from a business standpoint it was ingenious. The problem though was that these rental stores were violating copyright laws and they quickly drew the ire of Hollywood (DGA). After a six year legal battle, the courts found in favor of Hollywood (DGA) and the stores were shut down. And that was that, until now.
The thing about a good idea is that you can't keep it down. CleanFlicks showed that there is a decent sized market for sanitizing movies for a select group, but how do you do it without violating copyright laws and a now existing legal precedent? The answer; filters.
CleanFlicks attempted to rebrand and employ filters that would skip over anything in the movie that was deemed obscene, but they disappeared in 2013. With the demand for clean versions still there one company saw the opening and created VidAngel.
VidAngel differs from CleanFlicks in variety of ways, but the most important, legally, is that you own the movie that is being filtered. To achieve this you purchase the movie you want to watch, then they implement a number of filters that you can choose to turn on or off. And they are not just general filters either, they are quite specific. You can choose to block any scene with kissing or even scenes that imply kissing but do not show it. You can even mute words with their filters, anytime time the word God is mentioned it will mute the audio.
Again, from a business standpoint this is ingenious and this is a perfect example of capitalism at it's finest, but the question that arises is 'Why?'. Not why does the service exist, but way use a service like this? Not only that but doesn't whitewashing all the movies you watch devoid them of any actual merit?
To each his own and if you want to use the service I hold no ill will against you, because in an a way this makes movies more accessible to those who would normally be forbidden to watch it. And at the end of the day more movie watching is always a good thing.
Rich Stile @TheDevilsEyes1
Why Ash vs Evil Dead Was Worth The Wait
It was February 1993 and the eight year old me is boiling over with excitement. Why, because I'm headed to see Army of Darkness at the movie theater. I had never had the chance to see Evil Dead 1 or 2 in the theater because of my age, but tonight, well, afternoon matinee, that would all change. Coming out of the theater after Army of Darkness ended I couldn't stop talking about how awesome it was. When that ending hit, I knew there would more. The way it ended clearly left off for another sequel, so all I had to do is wait... But little did I know how long I'd have to wait.
As the months rolled by I spent my time buying up the AOD comic books from Dark Horse and then the figures from McFarlane's Movie Maniacs. After a few years past it seemed that I was no closer to another Evil Dead. But then a great thing happened, the internet, and I could read about rumors in real time about the next installment. And that is what I did with majority of my 90's, reading rumors about Evil Dead 4 (and Freddy vs Jason). Then I gave up, but kept an ember of hope burning that one day I would get my 4th film.
That feeling of boiling over excitement is something that is harder and harder to get the more you age. When you are a child everything is exciting because it's new and your experiencing it for the first time. But as you age you become less enchanted with things because you have experienced it before. Add to the fact that after 1995 you could get, almost, anything at the push of a button and now I became a part of the instant gratification generation.
That "want it, got it" mentality stayed with me for years and when rumors of Evil Dead 4 would bubble up I started to resent the franchise. How could they string along not just me, but tons of fans for years and never deliver. This resentment sat with me for years, but as you learn of the hurdles that have to be jumped to get a film or show made you begin to understand that somethings just may never happen. You may not like it, but you understand it. Yet that all changed when news of the series broke. I instantly jumped back on the " Evil Dead 4 is a go" wagon. Granted I had my reservations, but this was it. It was finally happening.
Now cut from eight year old me in 1993 to thirty year old me in 2015, only this time around I'm not alone and I have my own eight year old son who, you guessed it, loves Evil Dead also. That excitement that I talked about is back and this time it's more so because I now have my own son to share this excitement with.
You see, that wait wasn't a punishment it was just a wait. I had gotten so use to getting everything when I wanted it that I had forgotten that joy of seeing something that actually required patience. That excitement that I hadn't had since being a kid was back and it felt great.So as I sat there on Halloween night with my eight year old son and seeing the excitement on his face that I felt inside I knew that Ash vs Evil Dead was well worth the wait.
On a side note: Ash vs Evil Dead is probably the best series to come out of a film barring M.A.S.H. It is even better than another film is some ways because you have time to go into every nook and cranny of the story. But most of all, to see Bruce in the role of Ash again, well, that was worth the 22 year wait alone.
Rich Stile @TheDevilsEyes1
As the months rolled by I spent my time buying up the AOD comic books from Dark Horse and then the figures from McFarlane's Movie Maniacs. After a few years past it seemed that I was no closer to another Evil Dead. But then a great thing happened, the internet, and I could read about rumors in real time about the next installment. And that is what I did with majority of my 90's, reading rumors about Evil Dead 4 (and Freddy vs Jason). Then I gave up, but kept an ember of hope burning that one day I would get my 4th film.
That feeling of boiling over excitement is something that is harder and harder to get the more you age. When you are a child everything is exciting because it's new and your experiencing it for the first time. But as you age you become less enchanted with things because you have experienced it before. Add to the fact that after 1995 you could get, almost, anything at the push of a button and now I became a part of the instant gratification generation.
That "want it, got it" mentality stayed with me for years and when rumors of Evil Dead 4 would bubble up I started to resent the franchise. How could they string along not just me, but tons of fans for years and never deliver. This resentment sat with me for years, but as you learn of the hurdles that have to be jumped to get a film or show made you begin to understand that somethings just may never happen. You may not like it, but you understand it. Yet that all changed when news of the series broke. I instantly jumped back on the " Evil Dead 4 is a go" wagon. Granted I had my reservations, but this was it. It was finally happening.
Now cut from eight year old me in 1993 to thirty year old me in 2015, only this time around I'm not alone and I have my own eight year old son who, you guessed it, loves Evil Dead also. That excitement that I talked about is back and this time it's more so because I now have my own son to share this excitement with.
You see, that wait wasn't a punishment it was just a wait. I had gotten so use to getting everything when I wanted it that I had forgotten that joy of seeing something that actually required patience. That excitement that I hadn't had since being a kid was back and it felt great.So as I sat there on Halloween night with my eight year old son and seeing the excitement on his face that I felt inside I knew that Ash vs Evil Dead was well worth the wait.
On a side note: Ash vs Evil Dead is probably the best series to come out of a film barring M.A.S.H. It is even better than another film is some ways because you have time to go into every nook and cranny of the story. But most of all, to see Bruce in the role of Ash again, well, that was worth the 22 year wait alone.
Rich Stile @TheDevilsEyes1
Man in the High Castle Subway Ads are Beautiful and Offensive to Morons
If you lived under a rock, never studied world history, never read a book or your name is Steve Rogers and you just woke from coma, then I could see why you would be offended by Amazon's Man in the High Castle Subway Ads.
For those of you who are late to the party, the Allies won the war not the Axis Powers. The ads you are seeing are that of a fictional universe where the Allies lost. But let me be clear, this is all FICTION, fiction means, simply, not real. Now maybe your still confused and that's okay, just go find a tack hammer and hit yourself over the head, repeatedly, because you are a retard.
Now for those of you who have some ability to think above the level of a third grader and are not influence by the twats who are upset, because it's the hip thing to be, here is what Man in the High Castle is about.
The Man in the High Castle was originally a alternate history novel by the author Philip K. Dick. Set in 1962, fifteen years after an alternate ending to World War II in which the war lasted until 1947, the novel concerns intrigues between the victorious Axis Powers, Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany, as they rule over the former United States, as well as daily life under the resulting totalitarian rule.The show, as many other adapted works do, follows almost the same model but makes a few tweaks to be better suited for the screen.
I hope that everyone who reads this takes the time to at least read the book or watch the series. You're robbing yourself of a great story if you don't.
Enjoy the photos because this is the last you will see of it. As of 11/24/15 Amazon has decided to discontinue the ads wrapping the entire 42nd Street subway shuttle cars that had been scheduled to be displayed until Dec. 14.
Rich Stile @TheDevilsEyes1
Why Shia Labeouf Should Play Snake Plissken
Right now Shia Labeouf is getting a lot of attention from his #AllMyMovies stunt where he sat and watched all his movies over a three day period. Fans were welcome to come and watch the films with him, free of cost, and he streamed his reactions live. But that isn't our topic of today, today I want to tackle the Escape From New York remake and why I believe Shia should be cast as Snake.
There are endless parallels between the two actors, both have worked on TV for many years prior to becoming breakout film stars, They both have done the Disney route and they, at one point, would have never been considered for roles as action stars. The latter really stands out as the most important to me and is the main reason why I believe he would make a successful heir to the title of Snake Plissken.
Kurt Russell had a strong Western background from his work on The Travels of Jamie McPheeters and Daniel Boone to Quest the series and two TV movies. But Kurt's career was headed for a change when he met director John Carpenter while making Elvis, a biographical movie about the famous rock singer Elvis Presley, and it is one that he is know for to this day. John approached Kurt about a small film called Escape From New York, where Kurt would play the lead character of Snake Plissken. A man who can do the impossible because he is the badass that badasses run from. Kurt was hesitant about the role, but when they were filming Kurt ran into a group of five guys, while in character, they instantly stated "we don't want no problems, man" and took off. After that encounter, Kurt told John he knew that the character would work.
Shia broke out on the TV show Even Stevens where he played the dorkish young brother Louis Stevens. He was a scrawny kid who did not scream action star, but the kid did show he had acting talent in a small film called The Battle of Shaker Heights. Just four years later Michael Bay would cast him as the lead in Transformers. No one thought he would work but, as history has proved, he killed the role which lead to an even bigger franchise Indiana Jones. Regardless of your opinion of the films they did financially well and showed that Shia can be a lead in an action film.
But, I wasn't sold on the idea of him being Snake until I saw the music video for Sia's Elastic Heart. Shia had bulked up, grew a beard and gave a performance with no words that set the internet afire. Once the video ended I was sold on the idea. Shia could easily play the role of Snake Plissken and do it justice.
Shia has shown that he has the ability to "hold a gun" and bring in money while doing it. And while he may have decided to do his own thing as of late, it doesn't devalue his ability to give a solid performance. I know many will say "no way", but that seems to be every persons knee-jerk reaction when recasting an iconic character. I say look beyond and focus on the raw talent that Shia has. He not only fits the role physically, but has a range that is rare in today's talent pool. He has the ability to deliver and with the approaching remake by FOX, I say give him the chance. Because as history has show, the least likely candidate usually ends up being the only candidate.
Rich Stile @TheDevilsEyes1
Halloween Returns: A Perfect-ish Halloween Sequel Pitch
Michael Myers is an icon and a staple in cinematic history. The tale of HalloweeN, spun by John Carpenter and Debra Hill, is one that invites fear and suspense into every viewers heart. But it wasn't only Michael who made the film what it is. Donald Pleasence, as Dr. Loomis, is the other half of the film and that character is the reason why it works so well. Now how do you make a Halloween sequel, 35 years too late, and keep the dynamic that made the first two films so great? Well that is the question I am going to try and answer.
Note: This isn't a full-on script, it's just an outline of how I would make the film and try to capture a fraction of the spirit that the first two had. This is how I would have the film make sense and maybe make Michael the "boogeyman" again. With that said, I have faith that Patrick Melton and Marcus Dunstan will do a decent job..... It can't be worse than Resurrection, right?
First things first, Michael needs his "Ahab", Dr. Loomis, but since he is dead we must go with the next best thing....
------------------------------------
FADE IN:
Black screen. SUPERIMPOSE:
London, England
November 10, 1978
DISSOLVE TO:
INT. LOOMIS HOUSEHOLD --- DAY
MOTHER
Sam, are you ready?
We see a 19 year old boy who slightly resembles a young Donald Pleasence. He is in a black suit fumbling with a black tie. He is preparing for a funeral.
SAM
No.
We are introduced to Sam Jr., he is Dr. Loomis' one and only son. Dr. Loomis and his wife divorce when Sam Jr. was five. They had moved to the states together, but the Myers case became Samuel's only concern and it drove them apart. They separated and she, along with Sam Jr., moved back to England.
---------------------------------------
There it is. That is how you set up our new "Ahab", we take the son of Dr. loomis, mold him into a man who has never had his father's full attention and he now can never get it because he is dead. He would blame Michael for this and that would be the spark that sets him ablaze. Show that he is majoring in psychology and plans to follow in his father's footsteps. Follow him through his graduation then on to his move to Haddonfield where he signs on to work the case that ultimately took his father's life; Michael Myers.
This will bring us to Michael who, for just a few minutes screen time, would be in a coma. Sam would check in on him from time to time, but he would spend most of his time working with the only two children from that terrible night, Tommy Doyle and Lindsey Wallace.
(Sam is doing this because he wants to show he can do what his dad did, only better. He may have anger towards his dad, but at the end of the day he just wants to succeed in a way that his father would be proud of him.)
----------------------------------CUT TO 10 YEARS LATER--------------------------------------------
Michael wakes up from his coma (scarred over from burns) and, even though he was found insane for his sister's murder, he must stand trial for his killings in 1978. We have Tommy and Lindsey take the stand. We go through the trial and surprise, he is found guilty and sentenced to death.
We fade in on the lethal injection chamber and see teenage Tommy, Lindsey and Sam Jr. ( now going by Dr. Loomis). They bring Michael in and hook him up. The pumps begin and the poison is injected. Michael starts to shake and we think he is going to break free, but he slumps over. He is dead.
Hard cut to black. Fade in on Michael laying on a slab waiting to be cremated. He is loaded into the furnace and, bam, his eyes open. We see the crematorium tech shut the door, turn on the machine and head to the bathroom. As he enters the bathroom we see a girl come in. She is an intern who has forgotten her house keys. Just as she is about to leave the furnace door flies open and Michael falls out. She goes to run, but it's too late. Michael grabs her and throws her in the furnace and she is cremated in his place. Que the theme, Michael walks out....FADE TO BLACK.
This is how we get Michael back to being a ghost. Everyone will believe he is dead. No one is going to be looking for a dead man. Of course this now sets up Michael's targets. Tommy, Linsey and Dr. Loomis the three people who help get him "executed". Just to be clear, Michael is not dead and he didn't die and return Jason style. He is still a living person, just with unnatural capabilities.
--------------------------
FADE IN:
Black screen. SUPERIMPOSE:
HADDONFIELD, ILLINOIS
OCTOBER 31,1990
ONE YEAR LATER
-------------------------
This is our third act. We show that Tommy and Lindsey are now together and still visiting with Dr. Loomis. They are almost over the ordeal now Michael is dead, but Sam still finds it hard to believe that the man who claimed his fathers life is dead. After they leave he pulls out a box that holds two urns. One is nice, the other just a black plastic box. It's his father and the "remains" of Michael, he claimed them. After he goes through what is almost a ritual of berating both urns, he puts them away and turns on the news.
Someone bought the Myers house and turned it into a roadside attraction complete with gift shop. Needless to say the residents weren't thrilled but it did bring in a lot of revenue so they let it go. Inside they sold tons of junk, but their biggest hit was the Face of Death white mask. They are replicas of Michael's mask. Michael didn't like this so on the night of the 30th he broke in, stole a mask, killed the owner and set it on fire. The fire is the top story on the news.
Loomis watches the story unfold on tv and enjoys it, but when the say it was arson and one person was found dead, it doesn't sit well. Then the follow up story is a vigil that is being held for the young intern who disappeared one year ago after she left work ( call it Hill Crematorium and Funeral Home). How could he have missed this? It could not be a coincidence, could it?
Have Loomis pull the ashes and take them to a friend and asks for a rush favor, check the DNA of the ashes or at the very least determine if they are male or female. Though his gut is telling him now that Michael is alive.
Now we see Loomis go to the cops and do almost exactly what his father had done. Warn them that Michael may be alive, he is the one who burned the house and that no one is safe.
Then throw in a kill (Tommy and Lindsey's neighbor) and Michael lurking around , Sam getting the results back that it's female DNA and then we get to Sam rushing to Tommy and Lindsey's house.
Lindsey gets killed and we see Tommy fighting for his life. Just as Michael is about to finish him off Sam bursts into the house and runs upstairs.
------------------------------------------
INT. DOYLE HOUSE----NIGHT
(This is the Doyle house from part one. It hasn't changed that much. Tommy's room is now the room where the final scene from part one took place, we find ourselves back in that same room)
SAM
Michael!
Michael stops and looks and him. Almost like he knows him, not just from his trial, but on a personal level. He looks familiar, but it's not his Dr. Loomis. (Michael tilts his head to the side) After a beat he raises his arm and heads towards Sam.
Sam pulls out his fathers .38 revolver in his left hand and shoots Michael six times. Michael stumbles backwards, but he doesn't break through the glass doors and fall off the terrace.
SAM
Not this time motherfucker!
With his right hand he pulls out a chrome .45 and unloads a single shot into Michael's head sending him through the glass doors and over the railing and into the yard. Almost a shot-for-shot scene now takes place as Sam walks up to look down in the yard. But this time, as he peers out, Michael is there laying on the ground, bloodied and dead.
Tommy
Did you kill the Boogeyman?
SAM
Yes, I believe I did.
QUE THEME.
ROLL CREDITS.
--------------------------------------------
That's it, that's all I wrote. Now I don't believe it's perfect and it needs a lot of work, but I'm not going to do that. This, as stated, was just a rough idea, outlined to show how you could pick up from part 2. I would have liked to write in the Laurie character, but it wouldn't work and this is as close as you can get to original characters and still make it believable.
I hope you enjoyed the read, cause it was actually fun doing this. But if you didn't, well, sucks you wasted that time, huh? You should probably express that rage in the comments below. Go ahead, you know you want to.
Rich Stile @TheDevilsEyes1
Piracy and Indie Filmmaking: Something Needs To Change [Editorial]
If you're looking for a debate here, keep moving. I'm writing this in hopes that indie filmmakers will start to think outside the box and become active in fighting revenue loss. What I'm offering isn't a way to stop piracy but a way that you, the filmmaker, can make a living doing what you love and not lose all your money. Because, the fact is, no matter what you do your film is going to get pirated. It doesn't matter if it is right or wrong, it's going to happen. It doesn't matter if you are Disney or Blumhouse, it's going to happen. You remember that anti-piracy commercial, you wouldn't steal..., well people would steal a handbag, a car, a pet, a phone and they do do it quite often, so why would your art be any different? Now we can sit here and cry about it or we can get active and make it so that even if your film gets pirated, you will not lose money.
Lets face facts, money makes the world go around and when people steal your film, you lose money. Now most filmmakers I know aren't doing this for fame or fortune, but because of an overwhelming need to create. That doesn't mean they want to take a loss on everything, even though a lot of people like their stuff. No, at some point these creators need to pay their bills, buy food and, most importantly, have the means to continue bringing their stories to life. So the question shouldn't be "how do I stop piracy?", it should be "how do I not lose money to piracy?" and that is the question we are going to attack.
In this age we live in the ability to control your creation is easier than ever and why most people don't see that is beyond me. Filmmakers need no longer to adhere to the archaic rules of film distribution. You don't need to hand your baby off to multiple companies to handle foreign territories sales,VOD sales, hell you don't even need a big fancy distributor. You can control all aspects of your film, but only if YOU want to.
Lets say you have $700,00.00 (usd) and you make an indie film that costs $500,000.00 (usd). This is the total after production, post-production and anything in-between. You and your investors have a complete, polished film ready to go and you're exactly $500,000.00 (usd) in. Now you have $200,000.00 (usd) left in the budget that will go towards advertising (print, online, television), but don't underestimate 'word of mouth' it's free and useful. But before you go putting ads in Variety, how are you going to distribute the film, make back your $700,000.00 (usd) and make sure the film isn't pirated before you get that money back? Well, here is my shot at a solution.
You are going to handle the distribution on your own, you will setup a simple website that will let people purchase either a digital copy, a DVD or a Blu-ray. You will make this site accessible to the entire world, so anyone who wants this movie can buy it. The film will not be distributed on a set date, but only when you hit a set monetary benchmark (almost like a pre-order) and in this scenario it's $700,000.00 (usd). By setting the benchmark you are ensuring that you and your investors, at the very least, will not take a loss. Now you're probably asking "what about the cost of the physical media?", good question. You are not going to buy them outright, you are going to do a 'press on-demand' for all physical media, meaning if only 2,000 DVDS are ordered then only 2,000 will be produced. Same concept applies to the Blu-rays as well.
Now for fun, lets crunch some numbers. You get 25,000 digital orders at $15.99 (usd) each, 10,000 DVD orders at $15.99 (usd) each and 8,000 Blu-ray (has bonus features) orders at $24.99 each. This is worst case scenario, you'd pull in $399,750.00 (usd) from digital downloads, $159,900.00 (usd) in DVDS and $199,920.00 (usd) in Blu-ray sales. This brings you to a total of $759,570.00 (usd) leaving you with a profit of almost $60,000.00 (usd). You didn't loses money and you turned a mild profit. But let me be clear, this is worst case and I am being very conservative with my numbers. At least using this model you and your investors didn't take a loss.
On the off chance you're thinking "what about screeners?", let me address that right now. You will not send out screeners to every Tom, Dick and Harry. And you certainly will not let them view a digital file. You will press X amount of DVD screeners with a special code that pops up every few minutes in the center of the screen. Each code will, and must, be logged to a real person and if one of those DVDS gets ripped, you will know where it came from and you can pursue them for revenue lost. Does it suck to have to do that? Yes, but these are now the steps that must be taken if you want to keep your film from being torrented early on.
Here is a different scenario. Maybe you mad a film or a short for a fraction, of a fraction, of 500,00.00 (usd) and you know getting that initial investment back is going to be impossible. So how can you take your product and see some revenue from it? It's possible and it's right under your nose.
Stop discounting Youtube. Yes I get it, you are a ''real artist'' and above youtube, but do you want to continue to be an artist and lose money or would you like to see some type of return on your product? Hopefully you want to see a return and all you need to do is setup a verified account with youtube. this will allow you to enable ads. Yes, ads. They are not the devil and if your film takes off you could actually see a return larger than your investment. "But what if someone steals my video?", that's one thing that Youtube is awesome with. You have two choices, you can let your video stay on their channel, but all ad revenue will still go to you or you can have it set so that the video gets instantly pulled. Either way you won't lose, but it wouldn't hurt to check on your IP every now-and-then to make sure no copiers have slipped through.
I'm not claiming to have all the answers, nor am I saying this method will make you rich, but it will keep you from losing money. If you're in this business solely for the money, then you already lost. But if you want to live and continue to create then stop complaining, get active, use technology to your advantage and think outside the box. You know how the old way works and obviously it's not that great, so why not try something different?
(If you want to complain or say but....but.....but.....but, go ahead. BUT how is that helping you the filmmaker?)
Rich Stile @TheDevilsEyes1
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






















